To many, it has become strikingly apparent that the pandemic response, including the heaviest and most forceful push for the novel investigational Covid-19 products, has led to worse and worse conditions and outcomes all around the world. As we were forewarned from prominent and renowned specialists and vaccinologists early on, mass injecting during the pandemic could cause many harms, including driving new escape variants and repeated injections could weaken the human immune system. These would result in increasing hospitalizations and deaths, exactly what they’re purporting to avert.
A recent article by Dr Rob Verkerk, founder, executive & scientific director, at ANH-International, outlines prominent data that the official narrative writers and enforcers are not disclosing. Everyone knows that data, numbers, and statistics can easily be manipulated in various ways. We all agree (I hope) that this should not happen as it is disingenuous and paints a completely bias perspective. However, it has occurred a lot during the course of the pandemic and continues today still. In order to understand the truth in whatever data is shared, we need to investigate and analyze it deeply and critically. Dr. Verkerk has shared his deeper analysis of English and New South Wales data. Please review for yourself, but in summary, the more injected you are, the more at risk of hospitalization and death you are.
Whether you look at hospitalisations or deaths, those who’re vaccinated with 4 or more doses are the worst off. How much of that is because the vaccinations are negatively impacting their health and resilience, and how much is because those who are heavily boosted are already more prone to hospitalisation or death is anyone's guess. But what can't be hidden is that people who’ve received 4 doses plus are around 100 times more likely to be hospitalised than those who’re unvaccinated. This difference is a massive 2 orders of magnitude that is likely to include a hefty (read: real) signal regardless of how dirty or confounded the underlying data are
And other independent analyses are resulting similar findings. And, this is consistent with even my on community’s data.
https://www.anhinternational.org/news/why-it-s-fast-becoming-a-pandemic-of-the-boosted/
Emerging objective evidence of hospitalization rates from every country, state, province etc., reveals a clear view that this was not discussed or voluntarily reported from the public health agencies, governments or pharmaceutical companies in their messaging to the public. In Canada, various provinces are no longer reporting on these findings. As I see it, there’s a cover up narrative they are all repeating to garner and continue mass acceptance of their self interested agenda. Turn to Moderna and Pfizer’s regulatory documents package as we can see the incompleteness and substandard investigation of their own products that was submitted to FDA for review in consideration of approval. Dr. Malone writes of this on his substack, but the key points from the analysis by the author, Sasha Latypova are here:
Findings:
Moderna's nonclinical summary contains mostly irrelevant materials.
Moderna claims that the active substance mRNAs of Spikevax does not need to be studied for toxicity and can be replaced with any other mRNA without further testing.
Moderna’s nonclinical program consisted of studies of other unapproved mRNAs and only one non-GLP toxicology study of mRNA-1273 (active substance of SPIKEVAX).
There are two separate Investigational New Drug numbers for mRNA-1273: one held by Moderna, the other – by DMID (NIH), representing a serious conflict of interest.
The vaccine-induced antibody-enhanced disease was identified as a serious risk and was not excluded by Moderna due to absence of positive control and unvalidated methods used.
FDA and Moderna lied about reproductive toxicology studies in public disclosures and product labeling.
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/modernas-non-clinical-summary-for-spikevax-evidence-of-scientific-and-regulatory-fraud-fd53b4f7?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
It should be fair and balanced to say, we have insufficient evidence of the safety and efficacy of these brand new products. And, as the rates of injuries and deaths accumulate, related to these products, we all have a responsibility to lift the superficial veil covering the truth in attempt to understand what we are seeing occur in real life in real time.
Pfizer syndrome is a term that describes the various adverse effects seen and how these injections are worsening human beings’ vitality in general. As Dr. Kat conveyed in her recent substack,
What is also evident is that Pfizer Document Syndrome is real. Presentations post jab of old, common diseases is now presenting very differently and in odd combinations. Newly diagnosed hypertension is difficult to manage as the blood pressure is erratic. 24hr holster monitoring reveals unusual spikes and dips in the blood pressure. Systemic, painless herpes zoster (shingles) is atypical, but now common. Bullous pemphigous, an uncommon pustular skin disease, is now a common discussion in several of my medical groups. The combination of skin lesions, not usually seen together is adding to the confusion, making the treatment approach challenging. Sudden adult deaths, in previously healthy individuals, are now common. A local cardiologist's first question to his patients is "are you vaccinated". This is because he has realised that the presentation in his jabbed unjabbed patients, even for simple chest pain, now means something completely different. An ICU physician is busier now than she was during the peak of the delta wave. "Strokes and heart attacks are all I'm seeing", she told me. All of these, and the combinations, can be found on the list of AEFI and AESIs released by Pfizer. This is Pfizer Syndrome (as it is also called).
Pfizer syndrome encapsulates all the injectable products, regardless of corporate name, as they are all causing similar destruction and worsening morbidity and mortality in our human community. If we truly care about the greater good of humanity, we will take note of the many inconsistencies and omissions by those making the decisions, and step back to take a broader look at the totality of circumstances and facts. We need to open our hearts and minds to consider important information that these officials will rarely, if ever, discuss or mention. Dr. Kieran Moore, chief officer of health for ontario, recently, and for the first time, revealed the myocarditis rate for 18-24 year old males is 1/5000. Dismissing this serious side effect has been horrifying. My brother (43) suffered myocarditis from his first injection and was not diagnosed BECAUSE it was dismissed and not considered whatsoever in the differential diagnoses. Then he went on to have his 2nd dose and subsequently suffered a VFib cardiac arrest, almost died in front of his children, and now has cardiomyopathy and a defibrillator - which has shocked him multiple times due to scar tissue forming. Explicit permission was gained to share his story. So many others exist like his and are being ignored and even gaslit by others for publicly disclosing their injuries. An insult to the heart is always serious. It can be life threatening/altering, cause death, and it will have some long term consequences for those who are affected. So, dismissing and negating this MUCH MORE COMMON than advertised serious side effect from the injectable products, in our young population especially is harmful. It is also unacceptable in medicine to downplay an insult to the heart as being “mild” or “rare”in order to push more people to accepting a therapeutic known to cause it. We want to believe these NEW substances are tagline “safe and effective”; but, the truth is, we cannot wish or hope our way to this conclusion. And, enormous amounts of evidence exist to the contrary. It’s a difficult realization, as truth always is when it’s been superficially coated with lies.
Pfizer syndrome is real and becoming more understood as the days, weeks and months go on. Time is the factor that was removed from the rushed, bias, pharma trials that somehow got these products emergency authorization. We can’t ever replace time as a factor, and we are learning a burgeoning lesson of why studying any and all possible human therapeutics over TIME is required and necessary.
With time we have found many untold truths, such as these products do not stop transmission, they do not stop infection, and they do not reduce hospitalization or death. There are many emerging and documented risks from these products and the majority of people were whisked into taking them with little to no truthful information through bribery, coercion or threats. Manufactured consent is far from the legal requirement of fully informed consent. And, the greatest benefit in taking these injections occurs to those who are handsomely profiting from them. Understanding Pfizer syndrome benefits those who have already taken, those who are considering taking, and those who are injured by these injections. The benefits here lie with the ordinary person, not the corporate bottom line.